<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Salt&#8221; Satisfies with Shameless Stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/</link>
	<description>Musing &#38; misadventures of a writer, comedian, and local treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:17:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Quillio</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou Quillio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=1572#comment-2560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever reason, I&#039;m able to go for this type of picture done in this now-familiar style -- but can definitely see how others might not.

For me, there must be no gaping holes, and no &lt;em&gt;deus ex machina&lt;/em&gt; -- a fancy way of saying that it can&#039;t explain logical gaps by making shit up.  Ideally, the device causing the gap is simply cut.  Barring that, don&#039;t try to explain, just keep moving so relentlessly fast that I&#039;ve no time to consider the soft spots.  So fast that I&#039;d feel like a dick for picking nits.

&lt;em&gt;Salt&lt;/em&gt; slows enough at a spot (maybe two) in the second half that it threatened to break the rules, but didn&#039;t quite, IMO.  I do think the filmmakers expected to get more mileage from our extended uncertainty whether Evelyn Salt is a mole or not, but the audience for a Hollywood picture (including me) isn&#039;t conditioned to stay torn on that question and let it color the story unless you serve them clear reminders.  A quieter, less-Hollywood picture might get that benefit organically.  &lt;em&gt;Salt&lt;/em&gt; is not quiet.  I suspect a typical viewer decides early if she&#039;s good or evil, and flip-flops a little, but isn&#039;t in suspended tension on the matter.  That&#039;s the biggest miss here.

As mentioned elsewhere, if you like this kind of picture, &lt;em&gt;Salt&lt;/em&gt; is absolutely worth the rental (or HBO, etc.), so I agree with Kevin.  If you&#039;re in that group, should you invest a theater trip?  That&#039;s a jump-ball that tips maybe one way if you&#039;re curious about the Albany locations or just want to get out, maybe the other if not.

LQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever reason, I&#8217;m able to go for this type of picture done in this now-familiar style &#8212; but can definitely see how others might not.</p>
<p>For me, there must be no gaping holes, and no <em>deus ex machina</em> &#8212; a fancy way of saying that it can&#8217;t explain logical gaps by making shit up.  Ideally, the device causing the gap is simply cut.  Barring that, don&#8217;t try to explain, just keep moving so relentlessly fast that I&#8217;ve no time to consider the soft spots.  So fast that I&#8217;d feel like a dick for picking nits.</p>
<p><em>Salt</em> slows enough at a spot (maybe two) in the second half that it threatened to break the rules, but didn&#8217;t quite, IMO.  I do think the filmmakers expected to get more mileage from our extended uncertainty whether Evelyn Salt is a mole or not, but the audience for a Hollywood picture (including me) isn&#8217;t conditioned to stay torn on that question and let it color the story unless you serve them clear reminders.  A quieter, less-Hollywood picture might get that benefit organically.  <em>Salt</em> is not quiet.  I suspect a typical viewer decides early if she&#8217;s good or evil, and flip-flops a little, but isn&#8217;t in suspended tension on the matter.  That&#8217;s the biggest miss here.</p>
<p>As mentioned elsewhere, if you like this kind of picture, <em>Salt</em> is absolutely worth the rental (or HBO, etc.), so I agree with Kevin.  If you&#8217;re in that group, should you invest a theater trip?  That&#8217;s a jump-ball that tips maybe one way if you&#8217;re curious about the Albany locations or just want to get out, maybe the other if not.</p>
<p>LQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=1572#comment-2559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the review. I was hoping to see a genuine thriller and action film with a great leading lady but was disappointed when Evelyn Salt has a &quot;change of heart&quot; about her allegiance that destroyed the little credibility the movie had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the review. I was hoping to see a genuine thriller and action film with a great leading lady but was disappointed when Evelyn Salt has a &#8220;change of heart&#8221; about her allegiance that destroyed the little credibility the movie had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Green</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=1572#comment-2558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked it.  Of course it&#039;s absurd, but no more so than dozens of other genre flicks, I&#039;m guessing.  And I did buy the romance more than you did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it.  Of course it&#8217;s absurd, but no more so than dozens of other genre flicks, I&#8217;m guessing.  And I did buy the romance more than you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derryX</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2010/07/27/salt-nearly-impressive-in-its-stupidity/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[derryX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=1572#comment-2557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your reaction to this reminds me of my reaction to the Robert Downey Jr. vehicle, Sherlock Holmes. I laughed so hard throughout that movie...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reaction to this reminds me of my reaction to the Robert Downey Jr. vehicle, Sherlock Holmes. I laughed so hard throughout that movie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
