<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Thor&#8221; passable, but revels in its mediocrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/</link>
	<description>Musing &#38; misadventures of a writer, comedian, and local treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:17:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimelodic</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kimelodic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually like the comic based action films, but this one fell short for me... way short. 

&quot;..Natalie Portman, who in this film collects a paycheck in the most pathetic and embarrassing manner possible as a wholly unbelievable pixie physicist, phoning in a performance so distractingly pedestrian at times that I nearly groaned.&quot; -  I did groan. Loudly. Rolled my eyes and sighed quiet a few times as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually like the comic based action films, but this one fell short for me&#8230; way short. </p>
<p>&#8220;..Natalie Portman, who in this film collects a paycheck in the most pathetic and embarrassing manner possible as a wholly unbelievable pixie physicist, phoning in a performance so distractingly pedestrian at times that I nearly groaned.&#8221; &#8211;  I did groan. Loudly. Rolled my eyes and sighed quiet a few times as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebs123</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ebs123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not see the movie but I think that its purpose is to set up a back story for the Avengers movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not see the movie but I think that its purpose is to set up a back story for the Avengers movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved this movie - enough that I&#039;ve already seen it twice in the theater. I&#039;ll admit - there is a certain quality of the film that appeals to me that maybe doesn&#039;t appeal to you. 

But I&#039;m also a fan of comics and the movies based on them, and the only complaint I had about this movie is the same one I&#039;ve had about others - it felt like they tried to squeeze too much of a 50+ year old story into one movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this movie &#8211; enough that I&#8217;ve already seen it twice in the theater. I&#8217;ll admit &#8211; there is a certain quality of the film that appeals to me that maybe doesn&#8217;t appeal to you. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m also a fan of comics and the movies based on them, and the only complaint I had about this movie is the same one I&#8217;ve had about others &#8211; it felt like they tried to squeeze too much of a 50+ year old story into one movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Steve &lt;/strong&gt;- Really good point re: the romance angle and something I was going to touch on, but didn&#039;t because I wanted to focus on the movie rather than writing a treatise on comic book movies. That said, in short: you&#039;re absolutely right. In &quot;Batman Begins&quot; the romantic sub-plot really weighed that movie down, and it did in this as well (though I don&#039;t think the two are comparable in terms of quality and execution). What made &quot;The Dark Knight&quot; the better Batman film was not just the addition of some great cast members, but also the fact that it wasn&#039;t distracted by traditional and sexist notions of what appeals to the female demographic. It seemed almost silly to shoe-horn it into &quot;Batman Begins&quot; and even sillier in &quot;Thor.&quot; It is worth noting as well that the first &quot;Iron Man&quot; had the tension between Tony Stark and Pepper Potts, but did not develop into a full-on romantic sub-plot and was all the better for it.

Other areas I left out because they really didn&#039;t factor into the review/make it a better film: I didn&#039;t love the costumes, but it was going to be very hard not to make them appear ridiculous and I do commend them for not crossing that line. The scenery was fantastic in the throne room and especially the Rainbrow Bridge. Idris Elba was such a great choice as Heimdall and with his placement and costume was hands down the most visually stunning aspect of the film. Going back to scenery, however, the choice of a small New Mexico town was a lazy counterpoint to Asgard and really dragged the film down with what felt like goofy interludes with characters that had no right being on the set of &quot;The Last Picture Show.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Steve </strong>- Really good point re: the romance angle and something I was going to touch on, but didn&#8217;t because I wanted to focus on the movie rather than writing a treatise on comic book movies. That said, in short: you&#8217;re absolutely right. In &#8220;Batman Begins&#8221; the romantic sub-plot really weighed that movie down, and it did in this as well (though I don&#8217;t think the two are comparable in terms of quality and execution). What made &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221; the better Batman film was not just the addition of some great cast members, but also the fact that it wasn&#8217;t distracted by traditional and sexist notions of what appeals to the female demographic. It seemed almost silly to shoe-horn it into &#8220;Batman Begins&#8221; and even sillier in &#8220;Thor.&#8221; It is worth noting as well that the first &#8220;Iron Man&#8221; had the tension between Tony Stark and Pepper Potts, but did not develop into a full-on romantic sub-plot and was all the better for it.</p>
<p>Other areas I left out because they really didn&#8217;t factor into the review/make it a better film: I didn&#8217;t love the costumes, but it was going to be very hard not to make them appear ridiculous and I do commend them for not crossing that line. The scenery was fantastic in the throne room and especially the Rainbrow Bridge. Idris Elba was such a great choice as Heimdall and with his placement and costume was hands down the most visually stunning aspect of the film. Going back to scenery, however, the choice of a small New Mexico town was a lazy counterpoint to Asgard and really dragged the film down with what felt like goofy interludes with characters that had no right being on the set of &#8220;The Last Picture Show.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved the scenery, costumes, and acting of this film. Thor and his universe felt more like Flash Gordon than Superman, and that&#039;s a good thing. I think the love story was the only truly mediocre part of this movie, actually. Owe it to the fact that all superhero movies now seem obliged to include a romantic subplot, the highly esteemed Dark Knight film included. When a superhero movie can be confident enough in its characters and its story that it doesn&#039;t need to try to go after all audiences at once, that&#039;s when great films will be made instead of merely good superhero films. Instead of throwing in a love story &quot;for the ladies,&quot; they should just focus on making good characters and focused stories. Because ladies like those things, too. They would have enjoyed a story about a two brothers vying for the attention of their father if it was well-told, whether Thor was making kissy time with Natalie Portman or not. And I wouldn&#039;t say Portman&#039;s performance was terrible per se, because if it was terrible, I probably would have remembered something about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the scenery, costumes, and acting of this film. Thor and his universe felt more like Flash Gordon than Superman, and that&#8217;s a good thing. I think the love story was the only truly mediocre part of this movie, actually. Owe it to the fact that all superhero movies now seem obliged to include a romantic subplot, the highly esteemed Dark Knight film included. When a superhero movie can be confident enough in its characters and its story that it doesn&#8217;t need to try to go after all audiences at once, that&#8217;s when great films will be made instead of merely good superhero films. Instead of throwing in a love story &#8220;for the ladies,&#8221; they should just focus on making good characters and focused stories. Because ladies like those things, too. They would have enjoyed a story about a two brothers vying for the attention of their father if it was well-told, whether Thor was making kissy time with Natalie Portman or not. And I wouldn&#8217;t say Portman&#8217;s performance was terrible per se, because if it was terrible, I probably would have remembered something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/05/17/thor-passable-but-revels-in-its-mediocrity/#comment-7773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timesunion.com/marshall/?p=5187#comment-7773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a shocker! I didn&#039;t think it would live up to recent comic book movies based on the previews and Natalie Portman. LOVED &quot;Watchmen&quot; and even &quot;Iron Man&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shocker! I didn&#8217;t think it would live up to recent comic book movies based on the previews and Natalie Portman. LOVED &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; and even &#8220;Iron Man&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
