<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rick Santorum, gay soldiers, and sexy sex in the military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/</link>
	<description>Musing &#38; misadventures of a writer, comedian, and local treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:17:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinmarshall</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinmarshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Patrick &lt;/strong&gt;- Private organizations and the government are not allowed to discriminate, pass over, or terminate someone from employment based on their sexual orientation. Why should the military? We have granted them an exception from discrimination laws due to the increased pressure and dangers inherent in the job while ignoring the fact that unlike the vast majority of other jobs, it&#039;s 24/7 and all-encompassing. Your entire life becomes the military and it is the ultimate in service to one&#039;s country.

With that in mind, how on Earth could we ask anyone to go to such great lengths to hide who and what they are and remain anonymous in a hostile environment? In what world is that right and when is it ever acceptable to measure the viability of civil rights by popular opinion? 

When black soldiers were still serving in segregated units, they were still dying for this country. But it was wrong to segregate them, and there are many parallels in the situations beyond simple discrimination. In fact, the military was desegregated two decades before the rest of the country. I know many are loathe to make the comparison and scoff at it. But it is absolutely, 100% apt, particular since the arguments are the same: there were racists in the military who hated &amp; belittled blacks in the same way that there are homophobes in the Army who hate and belittle gays. 

The only difference between a soldier that won&#039;t bunk with a gay and one that won&#039;t bunk with a black is a few years. And we cannot, under any circumstances, allow the perception of practicality to justify the limitations or elimination of rights. That leads only to the continuance and strengthening of oppression and discrimination, no matter how noble the sentiment may seem at the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Patrick </strong>- Private organizations and the government are not allowed to discriminate, pass over, or terminate someone from employment based on their sexual orientation. Why should the military? We have granted them an exception from discrimination laws due to the increased pressure and dangers inherent in the job while ignoring the fact that unlike the vast majority of other jobs, it&#8217;s 24/7 and all-encompassing. Your entire life becomes the military and it is the ultimate in service to one&#8217;s country.</p>
<p>With that in mind, how on Earth could we ask anyone to go to such great lengths to hide who and what they are and remain anonymous in a hostile environment? In what world is that right and when is it ever acceptable to measure the viability of civil rights by popular opinion? </p>
<p>When black soldiers were still serving in segregated units, they were still dying for this country. But it was wrong to segregate them, and there are many parallels in the situations beyond simple discrimination. In fact, the military was desegregated two decades before the rest of the country. I know many are loathe to make the comparison and scoff at it. But it is absolutely, 100% apt, particular since the arguments are the same: there were racists in the military who hated &#038; belittled blacks in the same way that there are homophobes in the Army who hate and belittle gays. </p>
<p>The only difference between a soldier that won&#8217;t bunk with a gay and one that won&#8217;t bunk with a black is a few years. And we cannot, under any circumstances, allow the perception of practicality to justify the limitations or elimination of rights. That leads only to the continuance and strengthening of oppression and discrimination, no matter how noble the sentiment may seem at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The faces of the Republican party and their ideals (if they actually even have any) have by and large become irrefutably laughable.  The one thing that they can universally attempt to sell, fiscal responsibility, is referendum on total hypocrisy. Calling them fiscally responsible is to say Afghanistan has great Real Estate.

That being said, I know of several prominent &quot;famous&quot; (hate that word but) Democrats, as well as friends and family who are Democrats, who openly spoke of wishing death to George W. Bush. A sentiment I saw genuinely applauded. So it is kind of hard for me to get on all Republicans for small portions of supporters being socially backward as distasteful as it often seems.

Politics seems to bring about the absolute worst emotions in people, not dissimilar to sports.  We begin to see things through only our own lenses and excuse our own irrational hate as a means to an end.

Most of these issues are poorly constructed from both sides of the aisle. Of course sexual orientation should not be an issue in the military, but considering it is not something that has been widely accepted in the general population to demand that the Military make is simple and so is a little far fetched.

We (all humanity) make a habit of this in the world at large. Even though something is not universal, we want it to be universally accepted, so we apply it as an absolute when it is far from it.  The more dramatic a side can make the debate the more difficult it is for any consensus to be drawn. Politicians on both sides excel at the dramatic. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The faces of the Republican party and their ideals (if they actually even have any) have by and large become irrefutably laughable.  The one thing that they can universally attempt to sell, fiscal responsibility, is referendum on total hypocrisy. Calling them fiscally responsible is to say Afghanistan has great Real Estate.</p>
<p>That being said, I know of several prominent &#8220;famous&#8221; (hate that word but) Democrats, as well as friends and family who are Democrats, who openly spoke of wishing death to George W. Bush. A sentiment I saw genuinely applauded. So it is kind of hard for me to get on all Republicans for small portions of supporters being socially backward as distasteful as it often seems.</p>
<p>Politics seems to bring about the absolute worst emotions in people, not dissimilar to sports.  We begin to see things through only our own lenses and excuse our own irrational hate as a means to an end.</p>
<p>Most of these issues are poorly constructed from both sides of the aisle. Of course sexual orientation should not be an issue in the military, but considering it is not something that has been widely accepted in the general population to demand that the Military make is simple and so is a little far fetched.</p>
<p>We (all humanity) make a habit of this in the world at large. Even though something is not universal, we want it to be universally accepted, so we apply it as an absolute when it is far from it.  The more dramatic a side can make the debate the more difficult it is for any consensus to be drawn. Politicians on both sides excel at the dramatic. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a small number, but I agree that it&#039;s still very disconcerting and super weird.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a small number, but I agree that it&#8217;s still very disconcerting and super weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can only say that backwards candidates don&#039;t get elected by progressive people. They can only be a reflection of a segment of society. It may be small, and it may be restrained to a district, but it&#039;s there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only say that backwards candidates don&#8217;t get elected by progressive people. They can only be a reflection of a segment of society. It may be small, and it may be restrained to a district, but it&#8217;s there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I notice that one of the tags for this post is 2012. Between Rick Santorum and Mr. and Mrs. Michele Bachmann (Hey! Hey! Let&#039;s Pray That Nasty Gay Away!), it&#039;s more like 1912.

People who are this backward just should not be in government. -Roz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that one of the tags for this post is 2012. Between Rick Santorum and Mr. and Mrs. Michele Bachmann (Hey! Hey! Let&#8217;s Pray That Nasty Gay Away!), it&#8217;s more like 1912.</p>
<p>People who are this backward just should not be in government. -Roz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donaldelevy</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/09/26/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-and-sexy-sex-in-the-military/#comment-9110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donaldelevy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-9110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that the audience was wrong to boo but then another audience at another GOP debate clapped when they were told about an uninsured man who died. What&#039;s wrong witrh these people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the audience was wrong to boo but then another audience at another GOP debate clapped when they were told about an uninsured man who died. What&#8217;s wrong witrh these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
