<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you always agree with someone, then you&#8217;re wrong: the post-mortem criticisms of Christopher Hitchens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/12/19/if-you-always-agree-with-someone-then-youre-wrong-the-post-mortem-criticisms-of-christopher-hitchens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/12/19/if-you-always-agree-with-someone-then-youre-wrong-the-post-mortem-criticisms-of-christopher-hitchens/</link>
	<description>Musing &#38; misadventures of a writer, comedian, and local treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:17:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Watkins</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2011/12/19/if-you-always-agree-with-someone-then-youre-wrong-the-post-mortem-criticisms-of-christopher-hitchens/#comment-9461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Watkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=6707#comment-9461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was a great little piece. I&#039;m a huge fan of Hitchens, both the man and his work, and I think he would want to be discussed, debated, and scrutinized. He wouldn&#039;t want to be held up and endlessly praised (or knighted, as some people have proposed) just as much as he wouldn&#039;t want to be slandered and dismissed. I too thought he was wrong sometimes (though not often), Iraq being foremost in my mind. I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is that the fact that he was a person, flawed like us all, makes the times when he was on his game all the better. He will not be forgotten, and the world is better to have had him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a great little piece. I&#8217;m a huge fan of Hitchens, both the man and his work, and I think he would want to be discussed, debated, and scrutinized. He wouldn&#8217;t want to be held up and endlessly praised (or knighted, as some people have proposed) just as much as he wouldn&#8217;t want to be slandered and dismissed. I too thought he was wrong sometimes (though not often), Iraq being foremost in my mind. I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that the fact that he was a person, flawed like us all, makes the times when he was on his game all the better. He will not be forgotten, and the world is better to have had him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
