<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assholes on the Internet Hilariously Miss the Point of &#8220;Girls&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/</link>
	<description>Musing &#38; misadventures of a writer, comedian, and local treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:17:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinmarshall</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinmarshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general, yes. I agree. I noted it there. But I understand, though don&#039;t condone, the manner in which one of the staff writers defended it. 

The problem here is that &quot;Girls&quot; is simply representative of a larger problem in media and society. There&#039;s a very real cultural segregation in our society, where people put on racial blinders in their day to day activities. That transfers to film and television and results in what we see: shows set in New York and LA where blacks and other minorities are all but invisible. And I loathe when the discussion gets poo-pooed by defensive white people who think someone&#039;s simply being reactionary in asking serious and real questions. For them, post-racial  and &quot;colorblind&quot; is their way of saying &quot;can&#039;t we all just pretend racial make-ups don&#039;t exist and just act like everyone&#039;s white?&quot;

But my point was and is that to single &quot;Girls&quot; out and indict it specifically for this larger phenomena reeks of unfairness and inconsistency with just a hint of misogyny. Of the litany of shows that have premiered in the last two years with all-white principle casts, why this one? Is it simply because of privilege? I doubt it, because nobody made a peep about &quot;Entourage.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, yes. I agree. I noted it there. But I understand, though don&#8217;t condone, the manner in which one of the staff writers defended it. </p>
<p>The problem here is that &#8220;Girls&#8221; is simply representative of a larger problem in media and society. There&#8217;s a very real cultural segregation in our society, where people put on racial blinders in their day to day activities. That transfers to film and television and results in what we see: shows set in New York and LA where blacks and other minorities are all but invisible. And I loathe when the discussion gets poo-pooed by defensive white people who think someone&#8217;s simply being reactionary in asking serious and real questions. For them, post-racial  and &#8220;colorblind&#8221; is their way of saying &#8220;can&#8217;t we all just pretend racial make-ups don&#8217;t exist and just act like everyone&#8217;s white?&#8221;</p>
<p>But my point was and is that to single &#8220;Girls&#8221; out and indict it specifically for this larger phenomena reeks of unfairness and inconsistency with just a hint of misogyny. Of the litany of shows that have premiered in the last two years with all-white principle casts, why this one? Is it simply because of privilege? I doubt it, because nobody made a peep about &#8220;Entourage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Green</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the record: 1) I haven&#039;t seen Girls, and probably won&#039;t for a while, since I don&#039;t have HBO, 2) I&#039;ve read more about this show I&#039;ve never seen since Lost went off the air, and 3) I think, in general, the diversity argument is a legitimate concern, as this person notes:   http://thomwade.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/girls-incognito/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record: 1) I haven&#8217;t seen Girls, and probably won&#8217;t for a while, since I don&#8217;t have HBO, 2) I&#8217;ve read more about this show I&#8217;ve never seen since Lost went off the air, and 3) I think, in general, the diversity argument is a legitimate concern, as this person notes:   <a href="http://thomwade.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/girls-incognito/" rel="nofollow">http://thomwade.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/girls-incognito/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Eric Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Eric Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Damn straight . . . them and Black Sabbath are in rare company in that regard. Believe it or not, Bad Co. were viewed as a supergroup at the time given their prior gigs, and they&#039;re actually pretty darn good, with quite a few hit albums and singles under their belts . . . ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Damn straight . . . them and Black Sabbath are in rare company in that regard. Believe it or not, Bad Co. were viewed as a supergroup at the time given their prior gigs, and they&#8217;re actually pretty darn good, with quite a few hit albums and singles under their belts . . . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinmarshall</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinmarshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They called themselves &quot;Bad Company,&quot; released a single called &quot;Bad Company,&quot; and put it on an LP called &quot;Bad Company.&quot;

That&#039;s power right there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They called themselves &#8220;Bad Company,&#8221; released a single called &#8220;Bad Company,&#8221; and put it on an LP called &#8220;Bad Company.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s power right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinmarshall</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinmarshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They called themselves &quot;Bad Company,&quot; released a single called &quot;Bad Company,&quot; and put it on an LP called &quot;Bad Company.&quot;
That&#039;s power right there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They called themselves &#8220;Bad Company,&#8221; released a single called &#8220;Bad Company,&#8221; and put it on an LP called &#8220;Bad Company.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s power right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Eric Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Eric Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched &quot;Tiny Furniture&quot; and found it painful . . . I&#039;d actively run from most Lena Dunham projects based on that experience, even though my beloved is actually enjoying &quot;Girls&quot; too. On the flipside, I&#039;ve listened to a lot of Bad Company over the years,  so if that&#039;s actually Simon Kirke&#039;s daughter, then that captures my attention . . . not for the show, mind you, but I&#039;m totally going to go listen to &quot;Rock n&#039; Roll Fantasy&quot; now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched &#8220;Tiny Furniture&#8221; and found it painful . . . I&#8217;d actively run from most Lena Dunham projects based on that experience, even though my beloved is actually enjoying &#8220;Girls&#8221; too. On the flipside, I&#8217;ve listened to a lot of Bad Company over the years,  so if that&#8217;s actually Simon Kirke&#8217;s daughter, then that captures my attention . . . not for the show, mind you, but I&#8217;m totally going to go listen to &#8220;Rock n&#8217; Roll Fantasy&#8221; now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeghanButler</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/2012/04/25/assholes-on-the-internet-hilariously-miss-the-point-of-girls/#comment-9478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MeghanButler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmarshallonline.com/blog/?p=9988#comment-9478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahahaha. and i love you, k marshall. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahaha. and i love you, k marshall. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
