MMA Journalists Chime in on Wrestling in MMA

(Quick follow-up to my previous post, “You Can’t Have MMA Without Wrestling (Rebuttal to Michael Schiavello“)

Since posting about it, some real honest to God MMA journalists have added their two cents regarding Michael “The Voice” Schiavello’s editorial on wrestling taking the “martial arts” out of Mixed Martial Arts.

Maggie Hendricks over at CageWriter – who in full disclosure has extensive experience with wrestling as both a fan and a journalist – is in the same boat I am in terms of thinking the real issue might be that fans just aren’t educated on the finer technical aspects of wrestling.

MMAFighting.com’s Ben Fowlkes chimed in on the controversy with his blog post “The Wrestler’s Dilemma.” In it, he also notes – accurately – that wrestling is still a very hard sell to fans, citing the manner in which major MMA organizations avoid Antonio McKee as if he were dripping with open sores due to leprosy. It also includes great quotes from Phil Davis, Shane Carwin, and others who are befuddled as to why certain fans and pundits think a fighter should abandon a winning strategy just because it’s more exciting.

Again, drawing the comparison from another major sport, that’s like asking a team that makes it to the Super Bowl on a superior defense and a strong running game to completely abandon the strategy and have their Quarterback throw Hail Mary passes on first downs every time the ball is snapped.

What? It’d be more exciting, wouldn’t it? Continue reading

You Can’t Have MMA Without Wrestling (Rebuttal to Michael Schiavello)

Michael “The Voice” Schiavello recently gained a lot of attention for an editorial he wrote titled “Is Wrestling Taking the Martial Arts Out of Mixed Martial Arts?” for Heavy.com (link). In it, he argues…

…well, I’ll be honest, I’m not one hundred percent sure what he’s arguing.

I guess he’s saying that to call the sport “Mixed Martial Arts” is a misnomer, because it incorporates things like boxing and wrestling, which aren’t really martial arts. At least, that’s what he ends up saying, although it seems that his real problem is that he doesn’t find wrestling to be all that exciting and that the wrestlers in MMA are dragging down fight quality and subsequently stifling the sport’s popularity.

But here’s the thing: if you don’t like the wrestling aspect of MMA, there’s this great sport called kickboxing that you can give a try. Oddly enough, it’s never taken off in this country despite it containing all the exciting aspects of the stand-up games and various martial arts disciplines, but none of that poisonous wrestling.

Okay, that’s a little unfair, but it gets to the crux of my point: if you can’t at least appreciate the wrestling, let alone sit through it, then you’re not really a fan of this sport. Continue reading

Alistair Overeem and the Heavyweight Division: The Right Direction for Strikeforce?

Update: Scott Coker has announced that Strikeforce will be independently testing all fighters on tonight’s card because “it’s the only fair thing to do.” Uh-oh.

This Saturday night is the “Strikeforce: Heavy Artillery” show from St. Louis, Missouri, headlined by that other heavyweight champion Alistair Overeem taking on Fedor’s most recent opponent and rising MMA star, Brett Rogers.

Big muscles, anemic reputation - Strikeforce Heavyweight Champion Alistair Overeem (Photo: K-1)

The burning question isn’t whether Overeem’s skills may have faded over the last two and a half years whilst he battled far lesser competition overseas, or if Brett Rogers can use a superior ground game to overcome Overeem’s more technically sound striking. It’s whether or not Overeem is going to fight clean of Performance Enhancing Drugs, and if the Missouri State Athletic Commission is going to test him at all.

Jonathan Snowden over at Bloody Elbow wrote about Missouri’s secretive testing procedures, which seem to indicate it’s likely Overeem won’t be tested at all and, if he is, it won’t be as thorough and accurate a test as one might encounter in one of the more reputable States with an Athletic Commission (eg. Nevada, New Jersey).

Some have taken the media and bloggers to task for crucifying Overeem for what is, to date, unconfirmed speculation of drug use. Overeem himself says that it’s not unheard of for someone to gain ten pounds of muscle mass a year, and he’s also in the past attributed his dramatic increase in size to a diet heavy on horse meat.

Regardless, it creates even more questions of legitimacy in a fledging promotion that has been plagued with them over the course of the last few months.

Overeem, whether he’s using performance enhancing drugs or not, has not faced a real test at heavyweight in his career. All name fighters he’s beaten, a la Mirko Cro Cop, have been long past their prime. He has taken fights for the sake of appearing on the card despite several opportunities to fight in the States. It certainly raises a lot of questions. Not just about whether or not he’s clean, but whether or not he’s confident enough in his own abilities to face a real challenge at heavyweight.

It almost seems as if Strikeforce would have been better off without Fedor Emelianenko. Now they have a costly WAMMA Heavyweight Champion (a title granted by an organization that is for all intents and purposes defunct) whose management brings them back into the room after every fight and a promotional champion who will never be seen as legitimate in the eyes of fans. Even a convincing victory over Brett Rogers and subsequent win over Fedor Emelianenko will not alleviate the speculation about his size increase.

Some will argue that focusing on the lighter weight classes would cause Strikeforce to flounder and lose money without a heavyweight drawing card. Unfortunately, that discounts the fact that Emelianenko has become a bottomless pit of money for which they’ve seen absolutely no financial return and that, unlike Japan, fans in North America won’t pay money to see a fight if they don’t consider one or both of the fighters to be legitimate.

As I’ve written before, Strikeforce’s biggest obstacle to success is the view fans have of it as a disaster waiting to happen. Right now they’re trying to run uphill with a Russian heavyweight managed by crazy goons, a disgraced promotional champion who won’t fight stateside, and a post-fight mugging on network television amongst other mis-steps. As unfair as Dana White’s comments are at times, he’s not pulling these observations out of thin air.

It’s too late to steer the ship in the other direction, since they’ve already set the stage for an Overeem/Fedor fight or rematch with Rogers. But once they’ve hit that landfall, they’d be better off as a promotion if they followed part of the formula for success that brought the UFC to dominance in the sport – focus on the fighting and make the fighters the stars of your promotion, and not the other way around.

Mathematic Martial Arts: Why Stats Don’t Tell the Whole Story of Penn/Edgar

After watching Frankie Edgar score a huge upset on Saturday afternoon in Abu Dhabi, I had three reactions.

  1. Although I’d turn the corner on my stance due to his last two performances, my suspicions have been confirmed that BJ Penn isn’t the same unstoppable force of nature that guys like Georges St. Pierre, Anderson Silva, and perhaps Brock Lesnar are in their respective weight classes.
  2. What a great moment – the scrappy, hard-working underdog went in against insurmountable odds and proved that he not only belonged in there, but he was perhaps the better fighter after all.
  3. Oh boy. Here come the Math pundits.

Penn vs. Edgar at UFC 112. Photo from The LA Times.

Some took a hard stance against one score for the fight of 50-45, which I entirely understand since the first two rounds were most likely Penn’s with the second clearly going in his favor. Of course Dana White, the promoter with no filter, took to Twitter himself to complain of the score. But in the same Tweet, he also hit upon why BJ Penn lost: he fought Frankie Edgar’s fight, and not BJ Penn’s.

Much is being said about the statistics coming from the fight. Mike Fagan over at Bloody Elbow posted the Fight Metric data that, according to their assessment, gave BJ Penn the fight by a score of 49-47. Compustrike also released its assessment, which showed Edgar winning the exchanges standing and therefore the fight.

People have put forth that Fight Metrics have a much more diligent staff that provides a more accurate assessment of fights. That’s nice, but in the fight game, it doesn’t matter. I don’t mean just because judges don’t have access to that information or as clear a viewpoint as folks like us do during or after the fact through a clear High Def camera view. It doesn’t matter because these criteria are not how a fight is, or should be, judged.

Continue reading

StrikeFarce: Cung Le & the Importance of Legitimacy

For as outrageous and hypocritical as promoters and personalities in a given sport can be, so can the folks that cover the sport for a living.

Take, for example, the recent signing of James Toney to the UFC. Yes, Toney is past his prime and will most likely be used as a sideshow attraction and/or to prove some sort of point (as Freddie Roach has alluded to). And yes, Dana White now looks foolish for spending so much time and energy condemning promotions such as Strikeforce that put on what he terms as “freak show fights,” a term he did not invent but never the less made his own via ad nauseum usage.

However, there’s another fighter who continues to receive an inordinate amount of coverage and attention despite the fact that he clearly thinks of and treats Mixed Martial Arts as a secondary career. This fighter is anything from a complete fighter and has openly demonstrated his aversion to fighting anybody with any legitimacy in his weight division. He’s a passerby in sport despite the insistence of his fight promotion. He never has, and likely never will, agree to face someone that poses any threat to him. Yet the MMA media rarely calls him, or the promotion, out on it.

I’m talking about Cung Le. Continue reading

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15