Moosin Features the Worst – but Also the Best – Aspects of the Sport

There are two high-profile fight cards tonight, both involving former champions of the sport whose careers have certainly seen better days.  Matt Lindland will face off again Spencer Pratt’s BFF Kevin Casey on the latest televised installment of “Strikeforce: Challengers” series on Showtime emanating from Portland. All the way on the other side of the country, Polish strongman Marius Pudzianowski makes his North American MMA debut against former UFC Champion Tim Sylvia. The event, being put on by the South Korean promotion Moosin, has garnered most of its attention due to Sylvia’s dramatic fall from grace, going from being near or at the top of the rankings to headlining a local show weighing in at nearly 45 pounds heavier than he ever has for a fight and facing a man with only two fights under his belt.

The real highlight of tonight's "Moosin: God of Mixed Martial Arts" card is a 125 pound fight between Roxanne Modafferi (left) and Tara LaRosa (right). (Photos: MMAFrenzy.com)

The fight itself is sure to be a car wreck. Sylvia, even when he wasn’t in terrible shape, was hardly the most technically proficient fighter. His opponent is new to the sport, and his own striking coach told the media that his striking and footwork was “terrible.”

While the Moosin card demonstrates what many would consider some of the lowest depths of MMA, it also features a fight that is probably the most competitive fight you’re likely to see all weekend and exemplifies everything that’s great about the sport as well as the continued growth of women’s MMA.

Tara LaRosa – considered by many to be one of the best pound for pound women fighters – will take on scrappy internet favorite Roxanne Modafferi in a 125 pound fight. And what makes this fight so refreshing isn’t just the guarantee of a highly competitive and exciting bout, but also the attitude both fighters bring with them into the cage.

Continue reading

MMA Journalists Chime in on Wrestling in MMA

(Quick follow-up to my previous post, “You Can’t Have MMA Without Wrestling (Rebuttal to Michael Schiavello“)

Since posting about it, some real honest to God MMA journalists have added their two cents regarding Michael “The Voice” Schiavello’s editorial on wrestling taking the “martial arts” out of Mixed Martial Arts.

Maggie Hendricks over at CageWriter – who in full disclosure has extensive experience with wrestling as both a fan and a journalist – is in the same boat I am in terms of thinking the real issue might be that fans just aren’t educated on the finer technical aspects of wrestling.

MMAFighting.com’s Ben Fowlkes chimed in on the controversy with his blog post “The Wrestler’s Dilemma.” In it, he also notes – accurately – that wrestling is still a very hard sell to fans, citing the manner in which major MMA organizations avoid Antonio McKee as if he were dripping with open sores due to leprosy. It also includes great quotes from Phil Davis, Shane Carwin, and others who are befuddled as to why certain fans and pundits think a fighter should abandon a winning strategy just because it’s more exciting.

Again, drawing the comparison from another major sport, that’s like asking a team that makes it to the Super Bowl on a superior defense and a strong running game to completely abandon the strategy and have their Quarterback throw Hail Mary passes on first downs every time the ball is snapped.

What? It’d be more exciting, wouldn’t it? Continue reading

You Can’t Have MMA Without Wrestling (Rebuttal to Michael Schiavello)

Michael “The Voice” Schiavello recently gained a lot of attention for an editorial he wrote titled “Is Wrestling Taking the Martial Arts Out of Mixed Martial Arts?” for Heavy.com (link). In it, he argues…

…well, I’ll be honest, I’m not one hundred percent sure what he’s arguing.

I guess he’s saying that to call the sport “Mixed Martial Arts” is a misnomer, because it incorporates things like boxing and wrestling, which aren’t really martial arts. At least, that’s what he ends up saying, although it seems that his real problem is that he doesn’t find wrestling to be all that exciting and that the wrestlers in MMA are dragging down fight quality and subsequently stifling the sport’s popularity.

But here’s the thing: if you don’t like the wrestling aspect of MMA, there’s this great sport called kickboxing that you can give a try. Oddly enough, it’s never taken off in this country despite it containing all the exciting aspects of the stand-up games and various martial arts disciplines, but none of that poisonous wrestling.

Okay, that’s a little unfair, but it gets to the crux of my point: if you can’t at least appreciate the wrestling, let alone sit through it, then you’re not really a fan of this sport. Continue reading

Alistair Overeem and the Heavyweight Division: The Right Direction for Strikeforce?

Update: Scott Coker has announced that Strikeforce will be independently testing all fighters on tonight’s card because “it’s the only fair thing to do.” Uh-oh.

This Saturday night is the “Strikeforce: Heavy Artillery” show from St. Louis, Missouri, headlined by that other heavyweight champion Alistair Overeem taking on Fedor’s most recent opponent and rising MMA star, Brett Rogers.

Big muscles, anemic reputation - Strikeforce Heavyweight Champion Alistair Overeem (Photo: K-1)

The burning question isn’t whether Overeem’s skills may have faded over the last two and a half years whilst he battled far lesser competition overseas, or if Brett Rogers can use a superior ground game to overcome Overeem’s more technically sound striking. It’s whether or not Overeem is going to fight clean of Performance Enhancing Drugs, and if the Missouri State Athletic Commission is going to test him at all.

Jonathan Snowden over at Bloody Elbow wrote about Missouri’s secretive testing procedures, which seem to indicate it’s likely Overeem won’t be tested at all and, if he is, it won’t be as thorough and accurate a test as one might encounter in one of the more reputable States with an Athletic Commission (eg. Nevada, New Jersey).

Some have taken the media and bloggers to task for crucifying Overeem for what is, to date, unconfirmed speculation of drug use. Overeem himself says that it’s not unheard of for someone to gain ten pounds of muscle mass a year, and he’s also in the past attributed his dramatic increase in size to a diet heavy on horse meat.

Regardless, it creates even more questions of legitimacy in a fledging promotion that has been plagued with them over the course of the last few months.

Overeem, whether he’s using performance enhancing drugs or not, has not faced a real test at heavyweight in his career. All name fighters he’s beaten, a la Mirko Cro Cop, have been long past their prime. He has taken fights for the sake of appearing on the card despite several opportunities to fight in the States. It certainly raises a lot of questions. Not just about whether or not he’s clean, but whether or not he’s confident enough in his own abilities to face a real challenge at heavyweight.

It almost seems as if Strikeforce would have been better off without Fedor Emelianenko. Now they have a costly WAMMA Heavyweight Champion (a title granted by an organization that is for all intents and purposes defunct) whose management brings them back into the room after every fight and a promotional champion who will never be seen as legitimate in the eyes of fans. Even a convincing victory over Brett Rogers and subsequent win over Fedor Emelianenko will not alleviate the speculation about his size increase.

Some will argue that focusing on the lighter weight classes would cause Strikeforce to flounder and lose money without a heavyweight drawing card. Unfortunately, that discounts the fact that Emelianenko has become a bottomless pit of money for which they’ve seen absolutely no financial return and that, unlike Japan, fans in North America won’t pay money to see a fight if they don’t consider one or both of the fighters to be legitimate.

As I’ve written before, Strikeforce’s biggest obstacle to success is the view fans have of it as a disaster waiting to happen. Right now they’re trying to run uphill with a Russian heavyweight managed by crazy goons, a disgraced promotional champion who won’t fight stateside, and a post-fight mugging on network television amongst other mis-steps. As unfair as Dana White’s comments are at times, he’s not pulling these observations out of thin air.

It’s too late to steer the ship in the other direction, since they’ve already set the stage for an Overeem/Fedor fight or rematch with Rogers. But once they’ve hit that landfall, they’d be better off as a promotion if they followed part of the formula for success that brought the UFC to dominance in the sport – focus on the fighting and make the fighters the stars of your promotion, and not the other way around.

Mathematic Martial Arts: Why Stats Don’t Tell the Whole Story of Penn/Edgar

After watching Frankie Edgar score a huge upset on Saturday afternoon in Abu Dhabi, I had three reactions.

  1. Although I’d turn the corner on my stance due to his last two performances, my suspicions have been confirmed that BJ Penn isn’t the same unstoppable force of nature that guys like Georges St. Pierre, Anderson Silva, and perhaps Brock Lesnar are in their respective weight classes.
  2. What a great moment – the scrappy, hard-working underdog went in against insurmountable odds and proved that he not only belonged in there, but he was perhaps the better fighter after all.
  3. Oh boy. Here come the Math pundits.

Penn vs. Edgar at UFC 112. Photo from The LA Times.

Some took a hard stance against one score for the fight of 50-45, which I entirely understand since the first two rounds were most likely Penn’s with the second clearly going in his favor. Of course Dana White, the promoter with no filter, took to Twitter himself to complain of the score. But in the same Tweet, he also hit upon why BJ Penn lost: he fought Frankie Edgar’s fight, and not BJ Penn’s.

Much is being said about the statistics coming from the fight. Mike Fagan over at Bloody Elbow posted the Fight Metric data that, according to their assessment, gave BJ Penn the fight by a score of 49-47. Compustrike also released its assessment, which showed Edgar winning the exchanges standing and therefore the fight.

People have put forth that Fight Metrics have a much more diligent staff that provides a more accurate assessment of fights. That’s nice, but in the fight game, it doesn’t matter. I don’t mean just because judges don’t have access to that information or as clear a viewpoint as folks like us do during or after the fact through a clear High Def camera view. It doesn’t matter because these criteria are not how a fight is, or should be, judged.

Continue reading

StrikeFarce: Cung Le & the Importance of Legitimacy

For as outrageous and hypocritical as promoters and personalities in a given sport can be, so can the folks that cover the sport for a living.

Take, for example, the recent signing of James Toney to the UFC. Yes, Toney is past his prime and will most likely be used as a sideshow attraction and/or to prove some sort of point (as Freddie Roach has alluded to). And yes, Dana White now looks foolish for spending so much time and energy condemning promotions such as Strikeforce that put on what he terms as “freak show fights,” a term he did not invent but never the less made his own via ad nauseum usage.

However, there’s another fighter who continues to receive an inordinate amount of coverage and attention despite the fact that he clearly thinks of and treats Mixed Martial Arts as a secondary career. This fighter is anything from a complete fighter and has openly demonstrated his aversion to fighting anybody with any legitimacy in his weight division. He’s a passerby in sport despite the insistence of his fight promotion. He never has, and likely never will, agree to face someone that poses any threat to him. Yet the MMA media rarely calls him, or the promotion, out on it.

I’m talking about Cung Le. Continue reading

In the Wake of Pacquiao/Clottey, Boxing Needs to Change Its Approach

For the sake of full disclosure, I must first note that I did not watch  Saturday night’s bout between Manny Pacquiao and Joshua Clottey from Cowboys Stadium. As such, I can only verify what was said about the fight by observers, both casual and expert, and relay the consensus reactions of both part-time and hardcore boxing fans.

That said, the sporting of boxing has to change its approach.

MMA as a whole sells entire fight cards and brand names. This is not to downplay the importance of an intriguing name event or star power, as every promotion needs it in order to thrive and succeed. However, a disappointing or less than intriguing main event can still succeed and give fans their money’s worth based on the strength of the card and overall presentation. This is how the UFC not only became successful, but also made its name its biggest asset: the main draws aren’t just their champions, it’s the UFC itself.

Pacquiao's domination of Clottey had fans twiddling their thumbs and analysts grumbling (photo: Chris Cozzone, The Times Online)

Boxing is a completely different animal, and not just for its style and presentation.  Since its inception, the business model for boxing has been to sell fights and/or individual fighters. This is not necessarily a bad thing, obviously, since the sport has survived and thrived for many years using this method. The problem is that it gives the appearance that the promotional system in place for boxing is archaic and out of touch. As cliché as it sounds, we live in a rapidly changing world. Technology, the world economy, business, travel, and communication have evolved, warped, and changed at a nearly incalculable and unprecedented rate. Attitudes and expectations have swung in wildly different directions in some industries. Combat sports, and boxing specifically, may be no different. Continue reading

Weekly Recap & Links of Interest

It’s been a great first week for this blog, and I thank all of you who have visited and extended your compliments through Tweets, DMs on Twitters, e-mails, texts, etcetera. Now if only you’d comment!

Every Friday, Mixed Marshall Arts will provide a quick recap of the week as well as links of interest to other MMA News/Analysis sites. As always, I encourage all of you to check these sites out (more links are available on the blogroll to the right).

Firstly, a recap of our inaugural week:

Wednesday: Why the Rating for WEC 47 Should be the Least of WEC’s Concerns
The numbers came in for WEC 47, and some labeled them disastrous. While they certainly weren’t good, the WEC has far bigger concerns, including but not limited to an upcoming foray into pay-per-view and anemic star power.
Tuesday: The Plight & Future of Women’s MMA
In honor of International Women’s Day, I examined the struggle of women in sports and why women in MMA seem to be making better headway than their contemporaries in other sports.
Monday: Did Brian Bowles Give Up on Himself at WEC 47?
Going into Saturday night, many had heralded Brian Bowles as an untraditional fighter. Unfortunately, that lack of tradition may have cost him a title.

Now, some highlights of our friends over at other sites.

M-1 Global’s Co-Promotional Strategy Fails to Bring Brand Familiarity (Bloody Elbow)

Combat Sports Preview: Manny Pacquiao vs. Joshua Clottey (Bloody Elbow)

Why the Massachusetts Athletic Commission’s “Double Weigh-In” provision isn’t just foolish, it’s dangerous to the health of fighters (SBNation.com)

Promotional Battle Heats Up Outside Cage (Dave Meltzer)

Five Things We Learned From WEC 47 (Josh Gross, SI.com)

Why the Rating for WEC 47 Should Be the Least of the Promotion’s Concerns

According to MMAJunkie.com, last Saturday’s WEC 47 event delivered the promotion’s  lowest television ratings of the last couple years. The event, emanating from Columbus, OH and featuring a Bantamweight Title bout (see previous post) and appearances from former champion Miguel Torres and Jens Pulver, drew roughly 373,000 viewers for a 0.49 share.

That represents a significant drop from the previous WEC televised card in January, which was headlined by a Lightweight Title bout and the return of featherweight and perennial WEC drawing card Urijah Faber after a seven month lay-off. The only other card in the last two years to do worse numbers was last December’s WEC 45, which had no star power other than former Lightweight champion Donald Cerrone, a minor star in the promotion’s weakest weight class, who was just coming off a decision loss to Ben Henderson.

The sudden drop has had several folks speculating what this means for their initial foray into pay-per-view this April and if, in the grand scheme of things, this means the sky is falling on the promotion.

Former WEC Bantamweight champion Miguel Torres

The answer is no. Well, not yet at least. The WEC does have problems, but they extend far beyond a poor rating on Saturday night.

Continue reading

The Plight & Future of Women’s MMA

Yesterday (March 8th) was International Women’s Day. Originally established in 1909 by the Socialist Worker’s Party in the United States, the holiday has evolved into a widespread day of celebration for the accomplishments of women and observance of the struggles women face both at home and abroad. Although we have seen great advances in gender equality over the course of the last few decades, women still lag much further behind in areas including but not limited to pay disparity, respect in the workplace, and representation in areas such as politics.

Sports are certainly no exception.

Fighting for acceptance: Cristiane "Cyborg" Santos (right).

For whatever reason, the plight of women in sports – at least professionally – is not seen as a priority. Part of the reason is that sports (particularly in the United States) are still seen as more of a male pursuit. Sure, more and more women are becoming vocal fans and consumers of team sports such as football, but for the most part it’s still seen as a male-dominated industry. The participants are all male, the advertising is directed at males, and the various attitudes and personalities of the participants and personalities contained therein are rooted in stereotypical (and sometimes borderline chauvinist) male attitudes.

Continue reading

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15