I honestly don’t know why you wouldn’t be at Laughs on Lark this Wednesday night at 9pm. It’s only five bucks, and you’re going to see four legitimately funny comedians.
When I say legitimately funny, I mean this isn’t open mic hackery where you’re promised funny and instead get people farting into a microphone. I’m talking Jaye McBride, who is the nigh-undisputed best comedian working out of the Albany area. Joining her are Jennifer McMullen, a local favorite and regular at the Waterworks Comedy Lounge. Then there’s Anna Phillips and AJ Friedman, joining us from Syracuse, New York.
Hosted by yours truly.
Look, you’re going to need something to get you over that mid-week hump.
That’s what we’re here for. To hump you hard with comedy.
===============
A special thank you to everyone who came out to last Friday’s show at 51 3rd St. in Troy. It was a bit tough since it was SUPER hot and muggy out, but I thought everyone did a great job. I was thrilled to see that we literally filled every seat in the house and then some. A special thanks as well to Kirk for making it all possible. We’ll definitely be back again before the end of the year!
Firstly, TONIGHT!
Secondly, NEXT WEDNESDAY!
Hope you come out to both. Not one or the other; BOTH. Not for me, but because of the lineups. The best local comedians and two coming in from Syracuse for Laughs on Lark. I’m all about quality control, bitches, so when I say you’ll get more than your money’s worth, I mean you’re only paying $5 for each show but getting at least $15 to $20 worth of funny, each and every time, guaranteed.
Friday is my first time promoting a show of my own, or at least trying to. Going to do this again at the end of the month. Wednesday marks my first time hosting Laughs on Lark and taking over the reins from co-founder Matt Kelly (I’ll be co-producing and alternating hosting duties with co-founder Jaye McBride). I just about shit my pants when Matt asked me to do it, and with only days left, I’m just about shitting my pants and hoping people show up.
Don’t make me shit my pants a third time.
What else do you need or want to know? I feel like I should ask because I’ve been neglecting this space for so long, and when I wasn’t, I was writing in such a passive and robotic voice. Cultural critiques and analysis and all that. It was dull, wasn’t it? Well, that might be over. Or not. Idunno. I mean, it’s a blog, who gives a shit?
Anyway COME OUT AND LAUGH GODDAMNIT!
FOLKS, NEED YOUR HELP!
The Facebook pages for Kevin Marshall and Laughs on Lark are SO CLOSE to 200 likes! Will you give one to help us achieve the impossible dream?
Also, Jaye McBride fan page is also at the 130 mark, which is criminal.
So let’s get all three pages to…let’s say 250 likes. I originally said 200, I know, but keep going!
GO GO GO LIKE LIKE LIKE
(PS Apologies for the lack of updates. The website was encountering some memory allocation errors due to a malfunctioning WordPress plugin that I finally isolated this morning. You should start seeing more of my babbling soon.)
- He’s a closet homosexual
- Scientology
- …uh…scurvy?
- Scientology
- The whole gay thing
- She saw “Days of Thunder”
- He cheated on her (probably with a dude)
- She attained 3rd Operating Thetan Level and found out that it wasn’t a metaphor or a joke; they really believe that bad things and depression happen because of aliens.
- He might actually be gay and all his anti-gay stuff he’s ever said and does on sets is just a really poorly constructed defense mechanism
- Boredom
I had to go in to work today and for whatever reason didn’t want to to a goddamn thing tonight. I wanted to see people and to be around people, but didn’t know who to call or where to go.
So I did what I did when I was a child, and I just tuned in to Johnny.
Watch Johnny Carson: King of Late Night on PBS. See more from American Masters.
It’s been a while since this came out and it’s about goddamn time I sat down and watch it. Without getting too much into it, Carson and Bob Hope were and are the reason I act and am the way that I am.
So if you’re still up and/or not doing anything tonight, sit down and watch it with me.
As you may or may not know, I have another blog called Mixed Marshall Arts covering the world of combat sports & entertainment: MMA, boxing, and pro wrestling. Here’s a list of what’s gone down recently…
- Awkward [VIDEO]: Anderson Silva Goes Nuts on Chael Sonnen, Guida & Maynard Spar Verbally Backstage, and More
It’s sort of a busy week, so I have to put the focus on writing that actually pays. Apologies if it seems like I’m phoning it in over here. Tons of awkwardness lately. Video #1: Gray Maynard vs. Clay Guida, Round 6 Start watching at 8:12 or click here After … Continue reading →
- The Monday Main Event – War Games ’92
Welcome to a new installment here on Mixed Marshall Arts, the Monday Main Event. Each Monday, I’ll post a great and/or just plain entertaining goddamn match. This week’s Monday Main Event: WAR GAMES: Sting’s Squadron (Sting, Barry Windham, Dustin Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, and Nikita Koloff) vs. The Dangerous Alliance (Rick … Continue reading →
- New MMA Uncensored Live Blog Post: Bellator Courts Controversy
New blog post for Spike.com’s MMA Uncensored Live blog about the recent Bellator signings of Brett Rogers and Paul Daley: There’s another card tonight that features the return to the spotlight of a fighter who once competed in a main event on broadcast television, a claim that can be made … Continue reading →
Friday, June 29th, 2012
7:00pm
Cover: $10
(includes $5 towards 1st drink)
FEATURING:
Andy Ennaco
Kevin Marshall
Jaye McBride
William Hughes
Vernon Payne
Facebook Event Page
live @ Kokopeli’s
124 4th St., Troy NY
Come on over after you spend some time downtown and before you head to the Official Unofficial TNO After-Party at Daisy Baker’s.
For more information on Troy Night Out, click here.
I turned 30 in January and I’m just now, this week, starting F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, which puts me anywhere from 12-15 years behind everyone else in my peer group. I wasn’t given the gift of having the book as required reading for the New York State Regents; for whatever reason, the school or the Board of Ed decided not to sneak it into my High School curriculum.
That’s probably for the best. With a handful of exceptions – most notably Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and the works of Orwell and Steinbeck – I have a mental block that prevents me from enjoying a book when it’s compulsory. Gatsby is exactly the sort of thing I’d probably loathe if not skip reading altogether. I was good (too good) at faking it. I had at least two perfect scores on essays for one book I never read (Richard Wright’s Native Son) and another I never finished (Pearl S. Buck’s The Good Earth). I don’t know if it was out of laziness, rebellion, or a combination of both. Regardless, I’m sure I’ve missed out on great things, and I’d write an apology to the authors if they’d not been dead for decades.
Anyway, I’m enjoying Gatsby every bit as much as I’m dreading the film adaptation from Baz Luhrmann.
It’s appropriate that DiCaprio’s in the movie, because what I see here stinks a bit like that mess of an adaptation of Romeo and Juliet (titled “Romeo + Juliet”) that stuck everything in a modern setting while preserving Shakespeare’s prose. I think the intentions of all involved in the project were noble, in so far as exposing Shakespeare to an audience that might not otherwise enjoy it. But Luhrmann’s execution put a focus on aesthetics and hipness to the detriment of the material. It tried to be daring, but instead ended up just looking kind of silly.
I get the feeling the same will be said of Gatsby. The CGI’ed cityscapes and vehicles look awful. There’s one shot of a CGI vehicle that made me laugh. They’d have been better off using Benny the Cab from “Who Framed Roger Rabbit.”
I think it’s one thing to be artistically courageous, but if you’re not going to remain true to the spirit of the original work and/or make decisions that distract and detract from it, then why bother adapting it in the first place?
Moreover, it’s okay to not adapt some things. I’m not saying that a screen version of a novel can never achieve greatness, because that’s ludicrous. There are plenty of books that are practically screaming (in some cases intentionally) for a film adaptation. But there are also many, many books that simply don’t translate well to film, and some are outright unfilmable. Catcher in the Rye is the most obvious example of the latter while Gatsby, from what I’ve read thus far, seems to be in the company of the former, though I can’t say for certain having not seen the previous attempts to adapt it to film (although all reactions I’ve read and heard have been negative). It doesn’t have quite the same hurdles as Catcher in the Rye in that there’s much more of the story that can be shown, but it does have the same issue of interior perspective and reflection that makes a screen translation very difficult. I imagine that it will, or may have to, employ voiceover narration, which is just an awful thing to do to a film.
Anyway, I’m enjoying the book. But I think I’ll pass on Luhrmann’s film adaptation.
The pilot for HBO’s “Newsroom” opens on a panel at Northwestern University featuring Will McAvoy (played by Jeff Daniels) sandwiched between two angry, pedantic hacks engaged in the sort of unashamed punditry that would be embarrassing if it weren’t so commonplace. When asked by an undergrad why he thinks America is the greatest country in the world, he breaks. The idea and theme, in short, is that it isn’t, but it could be.
It’s a solid message and theme for which one can structure a show about journalism, politics, culture, and any combination thereof.
Unfortunately, the execution is marred from the outset by intellectually defensive patter. McAvoy’s message starts out well enough; he destroys the infantile punditry on the stage (a hamfisted but accurate metaphor for the state of op/ed in this country) and bemoans the sports team atmosphere in politics that does such a grave disservice to the issues at hand and the populace. Then, as if completely unaware of everything that had just occurred, he slips into another great lie and waxes nostalgic for a time when the populace was hyper-aware, politicians were hyper-ethical, and reform occurred only because the entire nation rallied around the moral imperative to do so.
If you’re wondering which age he’s referring to, don’t bother. Because it’s never occurred in the history of civilization as we know it, let alone the United States. It was the first, but not the last, time my head nearly hit my desk out of frustration.
Sorkin is at his best when putting characters in high-stress environments and forcing them to live their lives out in the midst and in spite of the demands of their professions. The best example of this was “Sports Night,” where the cultural stakes were the lowest but the characters were the most well defined. This wasn’t a coincidence. It seems that the more importance Sorkin gives to the profession of his protagonists, the more the art suffers and the more the message gets lost in speedtalk, pseudo-intellectualism, and hypocrisy, all of which are delivered on “Newsroom” in a manner akin to self-parody.
Imagine the newspaper folks in season 5 of “The Wire,” except doing television & all masturbating in front of a mirror.
As for the message itself: noble, but flawed, as I’ve already stated. That’s to be expected. We live in a country where grown men and women who deign to portray themselves as intellectuals try to win arguments at all costs, even if it means suddenly changing the topic entirely, and as a result end up shouting into the crowd until they can find a like-minded or sympathetic soul to retweet them. Thing is, though, that’s not necessarily a new development.
In the second act of the pilot, McAvoy waves a print version of a study (a laughably convenient prop) at his new Executive Producer (also an old and future flame of his because this is Sorkin after all) that claims the country is more polarized than it’s ever been since the Civil War. The first problem, of course, is that this wasn’t a definitive study but rather a flippant statement made by Jimmy Carter during an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams. The second problem is that even within that statement and subsequent surveys that have made more restrained claims of heightened polarization, the results are muddied by confirmation bias and a modern interpretation/separation of politics as “red states and blue states,” a relatively recent approach born out of lazy network news.
Which is all to say that some things are bad and people are hysterical, but the idea of anything in terms of tone, rhetoric, or misinformation from the Fourth Estate or beyond being a 21st Century phenomena is laughable to anybody who’s even remotely familiar with American history. The forlorn rumination of the collapse of intelligent discourse is a false construct. Little can be gained from shouting about the 1% during a discussion unrelated to finance, or deferring to and ejaculating all over the Constitution in matters not only absent from the document but unfathomable to its authors, or waving the Torah and the New Testament in the air while speaking on the floor of the Assembly. But it also isn’t helped by pretending that any of these are new tactics. It’s all old hat, and to pretend otherwise is every bit as delusional as the partisan hackery that “Newsroom” rails against.
Upcoming Events
There are no upcoming events.
Recent entries
- Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye…
- Listen to me LIVE as guest co-host of Alternative to Sleeping tonight at 10pm!
- Realtors: “WAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH” George Hearst III: “NONONOO SSSSHHH IT’S OKAY, it’s okay…here. Here’s a pacifier.” Kristi: “#oops.”
- Open Mic web series premiere tonight @ Lark Tavern
- Trust Me, You’re Going to Want to See This
on Twitter